Abstract
The boundary flux concept is a profitable tool to analyse fouling issues in membrane processes. The boundary flux value separates an operating region characterized by reversible fouling formation from irreversible one. Boundary flux values are not constant, but function of time, as calculated by the sub-boundary fouling rate value. The knowledge of both parameters may fully describe the membrane performances in sub-boundary operating regimes.
Many times, for wastewater purification purposes, ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes are employed to treat different wastewater streams. This appears to be feasible from both technical and economical point of view many times. Whereas initial productivity and selectivity to reach the desired purification targets are generally guaranteed, key to reach process feasibility is that the membrane must resist to fouling issues, with a limited reduction of the performances as a function of time. In other words, longevity of the membranes must be that high to minimise their substitution and, consequently, operating (consumable) costs for the replacement.
In this work, after a brief introduction to the boundary flux concept, for many different wastewater, the boundary flux and sub-boundary fouling rate values of different microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes will be discussed and compared. By this approach, it will be possible to separate those systems where the use membranes for their treatment results successfully from those that represent a challenge (from a technical and/or economic point of view). This will depend sensibly of the feedstock characteristics and, in detail, on the particle size of the suspended matter and guidelines for process designers will be discussed.
In most cases, it will be shown that membranes appear to perform very well, making this technology very interesting for many case studies.
